воскресенье, 22 мая 2011 г.

kate winslet titanic picture

kate winslet titanic picture. Titanic HEROIN #39;s Albums
  • Titanic HEROIN #39;s Albums


  • br0adband
    Nov 4, 10:43 PM
    Hmmm, and I thought it was down to me running it on a MacBook ( 2Ghz,2GB ). For the money I paid for it, it's a useful ( but not great ) product. However, I've found the support to be abysmal, and that's as important to me, as how it runs.

    I've only had a quick scan of this thread, but does anyone with a C2D based machine have it running? Any problems? ( thinking of Parallels C2D debacle, here ).

    I have a 20" iMac Core 2 Duo with 2GB and the stock 250GB hard drive. I'm running Parallels 24/7 with XP on a second 20" LCD monitor - OSX on the left on the iMac itself, XP on the right with the second LCD dedicated to running XP fullscreen.

    I've rebooted twice in 3 weeks just because some software on the OSX side required a reboot.

    To be honest, I've had more application crashes and restarts on OSX than I have under XP/Windows in the past 3 years. So much for "crash resistant" - and yes, I've had 4 kernel panics since I got this iMac home; that's more than the number of BSODs I've had under XP in 4 years.

    So, in the next day or so I'll be doing the following test batch and making a thread here for the results:

    - I'll be installing Parallels build 1970 clean
    - I'll be installing the current beta build of VMWare Fusion clean
    - I'll be installing XP SP2 *only* in default VMs under each of those two applications
    - I will not be updating the SP2 at all, in fact neither VM will have Internet access to keep that aspect out of the testing
    - I will install Windows Media Player 10 and Windows Media Encoder 9 as supplied by Microsoft for testing (see the next step)
    - I will be installing PCMark05 from Futuremark into each VM for comprehensive testing under both applications (WMP10 and WME9 are required components of PCMark05, hence me installing them in the prior step)

    I will then run the default benchmark in PCMark05 with the following stipulations:




    kate winslet titanic picture. kate winslet titanic portrait.
  • kate winslet titanic portrait.


  • diamond.g
    Apr 26, 02:46 PM
    Drive arrays can easily exceed 10 Gbps - today a 2 drive RAID 0 array can hit 10 Gbps.

    Single drives faster than TBolt already exist - 12 Mbps SSD drive (http://www.fusionio.com/products/iodriveduo/).

    TBolt devices haven't even hit the market, but TBolt is already too slow for many uses.

    12Mbps? you sure you didn't mean 1.5GBs?




    kate winslet titanic picture. Titanic - Kate Winslet
  • Titanic - Kate Winslet


  • radiohead14
    Apr 22, 04:31 PM
    they should just keep the current iphone design (sans the fragile glass back), make it just a tad thinner with a 3.7 or 4 inch screen, and longer battery life. that mock up is fugly, and looks uncomfortable to hold if that thin.




    kate winslet titanic picture. Titanic, Kate Winslet, .
  • Titanic, Kate Winslet, .


  • kainjow
    Nov 3, 10:10 AM
    This is what will get me switching to VMware vs Parallels, multicore support in virtualization!

    That will work nicely on the Mac Pros. Keep us updated.



    more...

    kate winslet titanic picture. di caprio kate winslet
  • di caprio kate winslet


  • milo
    Jul 28, 02:54 PM
    It has something unique, look at all the press covering it now, and how many of us are talking about it.

    Just because it's being talked about doesn't make it unique. So what is unique about it?

    And people are only talking about it because it's an announcement from a huge company. Which has nothing to do with whether it will actually sell well or not.




    kate winslet titanic picture. Titanic - Kate Winslet
  • Titanic - Kate Winslet


  • backsidetailsli
    Dec 1, 07:32 PM
    still better than windoze



    more...

    kate winslet titanic picture. Kate Winslet Titanic Drawing
  • Kate Winslet Titanic Drawing


  • Lixivial
    Jul 24, 08:54 PM
    Kinda takes away from that whole "Simplicity is everything" slogan Apple is known for, doesn't it? While I'll reserve my judgments on the design until it's worked into a final product, it does look like the user needs to take unnecessary steps to actually use the click wheel. Then again, pictures (drawings) probably can't do the interface justice.

    Still, not everything has to be digital over analog...




    kate winslet titanic picture. and Kate Winslet stole our
  • and Kate Winslet stole our


  • roblawton
    Apr 22, 04:15 PM
    Interesting...

    Looking forward to what happens with the gestures currently in development. Especially for what it will mean for the iPhone.



    more...

    kate winslet titanic picture. Kate Winslet in Titanic
  • Kate Winslet in Titanic


  • tristangage
    Apr 12, 02:51 PM
    http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5182/5613717273_8577b78ae4.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/tristangage/5613717273/)
    IMG_0802.jpg (http://www.flickr.com/photos/tristangage/5613717273/) by tristangage (http://www.flickr.com/people/tristangage/), on Flickr

    Camera Canon EOS 500D
    Exposure 0.003 sec (1/400)
    Aperture f/7.1
    Focal Length 300 mm
    ISO Speed 100




    kate winslet titanic picture. Kate winslet and leonardo a
  • Kate winslet and leonardo a


  • Mr. McMac
    Sep 14, 11:30 AM
    This t shirt

    http://i135.photobucket.com/albums/q146/atbglenn/Computers/d1bb1ec8.jpg



    more...

    kate winslet titanic picture. kate winslet in titanic.
  • kate winslet in titanic.


  • Jayomat
    Apr 22, 05:11 PM
    Damn that looks thin

    that's the current ipod you know?!^^




    kate winslet titanic picture. Kate Winslet Titanic: Kate
  • Kate Winslet Titanic: Kate


  • trule
    Jan 28, 04:01 PM
    This is a ridiculous assessment, based on nothing. Apple now has three growth businesses from which to build, and potentially a fourth. Hardly a company on earth would not envy Apple's potential.

    Based on the verdict of the markets it would seem that Apple's potential is not so great...but you know better than that right ;)



    more...

    kate winslet titanic picture. Kate Winslet - Titanic Gallery
  • Kate Winslet - Titanic Gallery


  • aristobrat
    Oct 24, 08:33 AM
    802.11n isn't due for ratification until 2008. There is a "Draft N v 2.0" due out next year that is supposedly close to what 802.11n will be but there's no guarantee anything will work until the final spec is released in 2008.
    As long as it works with the 802.11[whatever] that the iTV ships with, it'll work for me. :)




    kate winslet titanic picture. Kate Winslet Filmography
  • Kate Winslet Filmography


  • ten-oak-druid
    Apr 28, 07:06 PM
    The update of 0.2mm seems reasonable. 1mm was a joke.

    From the new comparison pictures, it looks like the top plate is responsible for the slight difference in thickness. Perhaps it isn't popped together tight enough? I'd try squeezing it really hard.

    I wonder how much variance is present in the black model actually. I mean if you measured the thickness of several black iphone 4 models from different batches. Perhaps there is variability and this will occur with the white model too. Or perhaps the white is very slightly thicker.

    As it is so small, this is not a problem. As the link in the update points out, most cases fit. The few that don't will have to be altered by the manufacturer. But I have to laugh at comments about owners of iphone 4 cases having to buy new ones for the white iphone they just bought to replace the black one. I seriously doubt that is happening to any great degree. And for those few who are buying white iphones 6 months or less after the black just for a new color, they are not going to complain about having to buy a new case. Suddenly after buying an expensive iphone just for the new color they are getting a sense of frugality? Right.

    Now on to better topics:
    1. Where is the white ipod touch?
    2. When will the ipod classic get a hard drive upgrade?
    3. Will there ever be an ipod tough 3G/4G? Will it double as a mifi?



    more...

    kate winslet titanic picture. Winslet won
  • Winslet won


  • bushido
    Apr 12, 12:29 PM
    HTC Sensation i'm waiting for uuuuu :) tired of waiting for an jb with every freaking release to get my features back that r common sense on android




    kate winslet titanic picture. kate winslet in titanic
  • kate winslet in titanic


  • Applepi
    Jan 29, 09:22 AM
    http://storeimages.apple.com/1804/store.apple.com/Catalog/US/Images/macbook-air/img/product-air-13in.jpg

    Love it



    more...

    kate winslet titanic picture. kate winslet titanic drawing
  • kate winslet titanic drawing


  • MacRumors
    Apr 14, 12:17 PM
    http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif (http://www.macrumors.com/2011/04/14/apple-releases-ios-4-3-2-ios-4-2-7-for-verizon-iphone/)


    http://images.macrumors.com/article/2011/04/14/131435-ios_4_3_2.jpg



    kate winslet titanic picture. Kate Winslet and Leonardo Di
  • Kate Winslet and Leonardo Di


  • FX4568
    Apr 20, 04:22 PM
    Ah, that clears things up a bit.

    But as stated, I'd like to see the power draw for the C2D+320M. Certainly then, in taking out the other power-suckers in the machine, that C2D+320M combo would draw more power than the LV i5 processor alone, would it not?

    Its a difference of 5-10W. Dont remember exactly. might be a little less since its not a full clocked C2D.




    kate winslet titanic picture. kate winslet titanic.
  • kate winslet titanic.


  • WildCowboy
    Oct 18, 07:47 PM
    Historical Mac shipments by quarter.

    <snip>

    Thanks for the chart...I always like to see stuff like this. But your 3Q and 4Q numbers for 2003 and 2004 looked a bit fishy, so I looked into it and made the corrections below for 2004. Don't know if there are any other errors.

    1Q2000 - 1,377,000
    2Q2000 - 1,043,000
    3Q2000 - 1,016,000
    4Q2000 - 1,122,000

    1Q2001 - 659,000
    2Q2001 - 751,000
    3Q2001 - 827,000
    4Q2001 - 850,000

    1Q2002 - 659,000
    2Q2002 - 813,000
    3Q2002 - 808,000
    4Q2002 - 734,000

    1Q2003 - 743,000
    2Q2003 - 711,000
    3Q2003 - 771,000
    4Q2003 - 787,000

    1Q2004 - 743,000
    2Q2004 - 749,000
    3Q2004 - 876,000
    4Q2004 - 836,000

    1Q2005 - 1,046,000
    2Q2005 - 1,070,000
    3Q2005 - 1,182,000
    4Q2005 - 1,236,000

    1Q2006- 1,254,000
    2Q2006- 1,112,000
    3Q2006- 1,327,000
    4Q2006 - 1,610,000




    Mherm88
    May 3, 08:30 AM
    You can add on a 115GB SSD from OWC. FAST turnaround.

    http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/turnkey/iMac_2010_27/SSD

    Too expensive, plus I'd rather do it myself




    auxplage
    Oct 18, 11:11 PM
    Listen, it's quite simple: For over 25 years Apple was a maker of almost exclusively personal computers and software. Five years ago, they introduced the iPod, followed by the music store (and now video, etc.). All of a sudden - within a period of only five years - iPod and music/video related sales account for almost half of their profit, and soon - by many estimates - will account for at least a full half (and possibly more).

    Now, do you think that Apple considers the iPod and the iTunes Music Store a cash cow? Hmmm... :rolleyes:

    Whether or not Apple considers them a cash cow is irrelevant because you are the one that proposed the idea.




    nies
    Apr 27, 08:54 PM
    Ok appleguy :p




    Dont Hurt Me
    Oct 18, 05:33 PM
    Its clear Apple is missing something in the midrange desk top line. Its time for the Cube or Macintosh or headless iMac or Max Mini or something. iMac isnt for everyone and the world has billions of big beautiful displays just waiting for a midrange Mac but if Apple prices it again the same as the towers it will be another failure. Its way past time for the next Macintosh. Needs a real GPU, at least 1 expansion slot and should be priced right along with ugly iMac:D or a pinch below.




    Ommid
    Apr 24, 06:36 AM
    http://www.9to5mac.com/63457/leaked-t-mobile-iphone-has-an-a5-chip-might-be-the-iphone-4s/

    The new iPhone 4S!!

    But who finds their iPhone 4 slow anyway!?



    Комментариев нет:

    Отправить комментарий